Explanation of Scoring Categories for Relevancy and Technical Reviews
All proposals are scored on criteria stipulated in the current solicitation. NEUP conducts two separate reviews on each proposal: a relevancy review and a technical review. NEUP's scoring categories for the two reviews are listed below.
|
R&D Review Scoring Categories |
|---|
|
Relevancy |
Technical |
| 1. | Unquestionably Relevant/Unquestionable Program Priority | 1. | High Merit |
| 2. | Highly Relevant/High Program Priority | 2. | Moderate Merit |
| 3. | Relevant/Intermediate Program Priority | 3. | Low Merit |
| 4. | Low Relevance/Low Program Priority | 4. | No Merit |
| 5. | Not Relevant/No Program Priority | |
Each workscope area defines its own competitive range; therefore, competitive scores will be different for each workscope area.
For more information about the review process and scoring criteria refer to the
2012 R&D Request for Pre-Applications in the 2012 Archive on
www.neup.gov.
